<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Miru  Nadielsk</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/9961</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Miru  Nadielsk</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I want to join in with the praise, here.  I work for a company designing for several news organizations, and it was hard for me to not forward this to all of our site managers.  I don&amp;#8217;t want to repeat all of the good points that have already been made (certain content belongs above the fold etc.) but there is definitely a problem, especially with news sites, of cramming all of the &amp;#8220;good stuff&amp;#8221; above the fold, making the lower section of the page a boring wasteland of text links.  It&amp;#8217;s like reading sales fliers with several hundred pixels of fine print at the bottom.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s hard for a lot of people to realize that scrolling isn&amp;#8217;t comparable to the more physical act of reading a newspaper&amp;#8212;it&amp;#8217;s quite easy to scroll and people enjoy finding good stuff lower in the page&amp;#8212;even the laziest of news/information hounds can be coaxed into reading more because of the simplicity.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I have passed your article on to several co-workers&amp;#8212;let&amp;#8217;s see what kind of great sites we can build if we can convince the traditionalists to take full advantage of their sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of#content_10876</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of#content_10876</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Miru  Nadielsk</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
