<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Luke Van Deman</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/92759</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Luke Van Deman</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dakota,&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;mobile applications might best be described as the boutique mobile platform.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the insightful article. It is a good reminder that while many folks have a whole slew of apps loaded on their phone, their is a user difference in those that have and have not installed applications.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It would be great to see a more open format for sharing apps across the board. Also, I think application packs that offer a bundle of well used and trusted apps would improve the download/install experience. Not just the mobile world, but lots of software suffer this exact problem in the form of plugins, modules, updates, and add-ons. Each seem to have their own spin on the solution, but it has increasingly become an apparent design problem without a standard solution.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Luke&lt;br /&gt;lukevandeman.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/four-key-principles#content_48851</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/four-key-principles#content_48851</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Luke Van Deman</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

