<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Erin Smith</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/9055</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Erin Smith</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your description of the emblematic as a &#8220;visible symbol of something abstract&amp;#8221; reminds me of the way that after a project, I&amp;#8217;ve often applied conversion/abandon data to the user experience maps to show clients the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ROI&lt;/span&gt; on a project.  Beside the paths and blocks on the user maps, I notate the goals and the actuals for clickthroughs to that particular path, as well as the cumulative total of clickthroughs to the other alternative (abandons, search bar, global nav).&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s a great way of visually demonstrating &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ROI&lt;/span&gt;.  Sometimes, we see that a little change upstream creates a big impact&amp;#8230; other times, we invest a lot of resources in something that,w ith step-by-step drop-offs, creates little impact.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/in-appreciation-of#content_13458</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/in-appreciation-of#content_13458</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Erin Smith</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
