<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Matthew  Doty</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/8864</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:33:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Matthew  Doty</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great interview! Very practical and informative&amp;#8230; and brief. Great &amp;#8220;ROI&amp;#8221; for the 18 minutes it takes to listen to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/straight-from-the#content_8847</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/straight-from-the#content_8847</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:33:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Matthew  Doty</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for speaking out on this! When it comes to this type of user research,  I sometimes feel like a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Over the last 5 years, I&amp;#8217;ve been trying to convince clients that quality user data IS within their reach thought this type of research. I still find that I run into barriers of time cost and scope. What have you found to be effective in overcoming these types of concerns?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/extreme-user#content_17762</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/extreme-user#content_17762</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:28:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Matthew  Doty</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
