<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Grant Campbell</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/8694</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Grant Campbell</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#8217;re quite right, Richard: I didn&amp;#8217;t make that point as well as I&amp;#8217;d hoped.  A better analogy would probably be having dinner with your in-laws.  While there&amp;#8217;s no question (hopefully) that your in-laws care about you, and welcome you, and want you to be there, they have a rapport with your spouse that goes way, way back, and to some extent you have to be a good sport and listen to that history play itself out in anecdotes, news of people you&amp;#8217;ve never heard of, and old jokes that don&amp;#8217;t split your side the way they split everyone else&amp;#8217;s.  That&amp;#8217;s what I mean by &amp;#8220;insularity&amp;#8221;: I was trying to rescue the word from its negative connotation, and suggest that the awkwardness a newcomer feels is not the result of deliberate exclusion, but simply the inevitable discomfort at being among people with a history that he or she hasn&amp;#8217;t yet begun to share.  And frankly, I&amp;#8217;d rather have that then the reverse phenomenon: being fastened on to voraciously by veterans who are lusting for new blood for their task forces and committees.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/being-shallow#content_8972</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/being-shallow#content_8972</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Grant Campbell</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
