<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Tom DellAringa</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/8519</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Tom DellAringa</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Fred, for the exhaustive article. Having not done any content analysis before, this is an excellent primer on the subject. I wasn&amp;#8217;t sure how useful an analysis could really be but after reading this it makes total sense.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;How would a quantitative evaluation differ? Would I be correct in assuming its more of a hard statistical expression of the content?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-analysis#content_9111</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-analysis#content_9111</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tom DellAringa</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
