<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by James Robertson</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/779</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by James Robertson</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While this is an interesting approach, I would also question whether providing a search engine on over  a million pages, and 8000 separate intranets is really a solution.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Surely the issue is information overload, not necessarily difficulties in finding information. And what of the quality, accuracy and relevance of all these pages?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I would expect that a thorough review of the content (no small task, of course) would end up deleting 75% of the pages&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Anyway, all good food for thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/msweb_an_enterprise_intranet_1#content_799</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/msweb_an_enterprise_intranet_1#content_799</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For perhaps the first time, this article provides a way of demonstrating measurable improvements to the IA of a site, in a way that parallels quantitative usability testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/2705#content_2809</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/2705#content_2809</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rob,&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;As part of this team, we must understand organisational issues, but are not responsible for resolving them.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Actually, I agree with you on this. :-)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;My take is that really, we should be responsible for resolving some (if not all) of the fundamental organisational issues. I just wanted to soften the message, so as not to scare off too many IA&amp;#8217;s. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Cheers, James&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/succeeding_at_i#content_3119</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/succeeding_at_i#content_3119</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, organisational politics is a major factor. This is why I&amp;#8217;m spending most of my time reading books on leadership and organisational change&amp;#8230; :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/succeeding_at_i#content_3252</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/succeeding_at_i#content_3252</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great article! This is a space that seriously needs some vendor-independent thinking, so I&amp;#8217;m very much looking forward to the rest of the articles in the series&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-challenge-of#content_4379</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-challenge-of#content_4379</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Masood,&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Excellent article! As an industry, I don&amp;#8217;t think we can have too many articles that remind organisations of the fundamentals, encouraging them not to get caught up in the technology.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;As I tend to say in workshops: &amp;#8220;the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CMS&lt;/span&gt; won&amp;#8217;t solve any of your business problems, it&amp;#8217;s just an enabler&amp;#8221;. It&amp;#8217;s the work around the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CMS&lt;/span&gt; (publishing processes, content, IA, etc) that really adds the value&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;James&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/better-content#content_5323</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/better-content#content_5323</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good article, although I think you understate the effort involved in &amp;#8220;create a taxononmy&amp;#8221;! :-)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve also written similar recommendations in the past:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_fixingsearch/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_fixingsearch/index.h&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/strategies-for#content_12304</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/strategies-for#content_12304</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, definitely a topic that warrants discussion within the IA community, particularly those working within organisations. At the end of the day, we need to take (some) responsibility for getting the right outcome, not just creating the right design.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-information#content_12920</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-information#content_12920</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>James Robertson</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
