<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Keith Pulver</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/536</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Keith Pulver</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent!!...a very conicse but elegant explanatiion&amp;#8230;although it seems somehow sad that after all this time we still have to explain &amp;#8220;it&amp;#8221; so often. I suppose that it comes from Customers being told and then actually believing they will get a &amp;#8220;free design&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;save money&amp;#8221; having the programmers sort of &amp;#8220;design-while-coding&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Nothing shows up as quickly as a lack of design (or blueprint or plan) as evidenced by several big-name federal agencies being forced to abandon multi-million dollar development projects because they attempted to follow the Evolutionary Model instead of the Intelligent Design Model.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interaction_modeling#content_2589</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interaction_modeling#content_2589</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Keith Pulver</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
