<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Tom Tom</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/533</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Tom Tom</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, any navigation with an inpenetrable border is going to be effective. It is the then width that makes it even easier to navigate.&lt;br /&gt;According to the research article, &amp;#8220;Width guidelines for rectangular objects with penetrable and impenetrable borders&amp;#8221; found in the journal, Behaviour &amp;amp; Information Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, January-February 2006.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It is due to the fact that the right hand nav was against the edge. However, if it had been floating (if the browser window wasn&amp;#8217;t full size) it would actually be slower and not as easy to navigate. Therefore, the right hand nav only becomes as effective as a left hand nav when it has an inpenetrable border.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Height of the buttons play a factor as well, but a more dramatic change in speed is found with the width of the buttons.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I think that the Audi site is a nice attempt, but I feel it has a poor layout. When the menu isn&amp;#8217;t expanded to a sub menu it creates an awkward empty trapped white space. The other fact of the matter is, you need it full screen to view it. Personally, I rarely view web pages in full size because I like being able to see multiple windows and my resolution is often too large for things anyway. This of course creates NO inpenetrable borders for me so the nav wouldn&amp;#8217;t matter so much for speed in my case. Just for aestethics. Which I then will have to agree with a previous comment about reading from left to right.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We are accustom to reading left to right, top to bottom. So having a nav way out on the right is quite awkward. Also, one final thing to note&amp;#8212;If you are like me and use smaller windows, then you occasionally have to scroll to the right. It&amp;#8217;s not so bad when you&amp;#8217;re scrolling to the right to read some content (because you see the paragraph continues, when your eye follows a line you know it continues), but in this case you can&amp;#8217;t see the navigation menu at all. If you aren&amp;#8217;t sharp enough to realize your window is too small, then you&amp;#8217;ll miss the nav. Of course you&amp;#8217;ll realize this&amp;#8230;just it will take time. Therefore reducing the effectivness of the navigation.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Bottom line. In Western culture, a right hand navigation is &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NOT&lt;/span&gt; more effective (I think the study done here, while interesting, didn&amp;#8217;t account for some variables) than a left hand nav due to the way we read and how we are used to things. &lt;span class="caps"&gt;AND&lt;/span&gt; it can assumed that it is far less effective if the browser window isn&amp;#8217;t full screen creating an inpenetrable border.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Solutions/ideas to make the right hand nav even more effective: increase the size of the buttons &amp;#8211; in particular, the width of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/challenging_the_status_quo_audi_redesigned#content_2587</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/challenging_the_status_quo_audi_redesigned#content_2587</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tom Tom</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

