<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Nancy Zacks</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/5001</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:45:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Nancy Zacks</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As in information architect and technical communicator, I&amp;#8217;ve been thinking a lot about this lately. In working on a large taxonomy, I started to realize that I was using my audience analysis, business requirements analysis, and indexing skills from the &amp;#8220;old days&amp;#8221; as a software technical writer. I started thinking of more similarities between IA and Technical Communication and have recently concluded that the &amp;#8220;inputs&amp;#8221; to the tech comm and IA processes are very similar, if not the same. The outputs differ because the commumications &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MEDIA&lt;/span&gt; are different.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Nancy Zacks&lt;br /&gt;preciseword.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using-technical#content_6989</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using-technical#content_6989</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:45:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Nancy Zacks</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
