<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by tarzun b</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/439</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by tarzun b</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting to consider (and possibly long over due) whether these widgets we have taken for granted should or could be re-evaluated from the ground up again, given what they are required to do today. Often when a tool is built for a requirement, that tool can only be extended for a certain number or requirement itterations before it purpose exceeds it&amp;#8217;s ability to perform it&amp;#8217;s required tasks. Perhaps we should also talk about whether these widgets should continue to be reused from their historical root widgets at all?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/2470#content_2497</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/2470#content_2497</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>tarzun b</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
