<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Richard Bye</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/3988</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Richard Bye</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea.  Most project managers I interact with are unaware that user-centred systems design exists!  A couple of high profile projects have hit on the idea of using personas to inform the design process before purchasing technical solutions, so I&amp;#8217;m keen that we squeeze the maximum value out of this opportunity.  Understanding other IAs experiences of some of the potential pitfalls and opportunities for quick wins would be really useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/6496#content_6514</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/6496#content_6514</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Bye</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In high pressure, high constraint environments personas are a key tool to bridge the gap between user requirements and management decisions.  Integrating real user data to inform the development of these (often)mythical beasts has to be a good thing, doesn&amp;#8217;t it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/5604#content_6524</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/5604#content_6524</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:16:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Bye</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
