<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Natasha Lloyd</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/3824</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Natasha Lloyd</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I am also pioneering a usability program at my company and I would &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LOVE&lt;/span&gt; to hear your ideas!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/5514#content_5842</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/5514#content_5842</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Natasha Lloyd</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a good idea. Most of the advice I&amp;#8217;ve heard is to stay away from internal usability testing (unless you are designing for internal users) and I&amp;#8217;d like to hear a more balanced analysis because sometimes all we can do is internal usability testing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/9474#content_9495</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/9474#content_9495</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Natasha Lloyd</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

