<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by jod kaftan</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/3787</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by jod kaftan</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I find it amusing that IAs think content strategy is something that just involves &amp;#8220;being good with words.&amp;#8221;  Writing does not consist of &amp;#8220;making words.&amp;#8221; Writing is the continuity of a thought process revealed through words.  To assume all an IA has to do is brush up on their vocabulary to be sound at content strategy is like asking a content strategist to make your wireframes.  Content strategy consists of a holistic view that&amp;#8217;s not always measurable in quantifiable deliverables. It is a qualitative art that often involves intenste collaboration with disciplines who can&amp;#8217;t penetrate the vernacular of speech with even their best instincts.  And of course, content strategy is not bound only to content creation. A content strategist is better equipped to evaluate the merits of a client&amp;#8217;s legacy content than any other discipline as most CS come from journalism/marketing/communication backgrounds.  As a former employee of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;AARF&lt;/span&gt;, I can recall many a time a designer or IA came up to my pod with a plea for help.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the#content_5826</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the#content_5826</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jod kaftan</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
