<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by jane motz hayes</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/350</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by jane motz hayes</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I am sometime amused when these metaphors make it into the Webster or Oxford (i.e. googling, downloadble, accessing) and the way that hardware / software metaphor influences our non-technological English parlance. I&#8217;m looking forward to part 2 of this article.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using_adoption_#content_3197</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using_adoption_#content_3197</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jane motz hayes</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Having just gone through this process using paper, I am interested in how to streamline the recording and analysis.  Please write it David.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/7015#content_7027</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/7015#content_7027</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:24:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jane motz hayes</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
