<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Chris Avore</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/3239</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Chris Avore</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are huge opportunities to increase adoption and engagement in these strong, weak, and temporary ties.  Unfortunately, in many of the off-the-shelf social or collaboration platforms I&amp;#8217;ve seen (my experience is limited to enterprise social tools), the ability to recognize and target interactions based on how well people may know each other is a pipe dream.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Um, check that: a pipe dream would suggest some of these providers are aware of the opportunities that exist in those relationships. In fact, I find many of these providers/vendors/etc expect us to be wowed just to be able to add *friends* or *colleagues* because Facebook and LinkedIn do it.   Hopefully as these products continue to mature and react to more innovative entrants into the market, we&amp;#8217;ll see greater functionality in reputation scoring and relationship management.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Until then, without sounding like I&amp;#8217;m giving up, I feel like my hands are tied to the technology my clients have agreed to long before UX types like myself enter the picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_52704</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_52704</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Chris Avore</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

