<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Martijn van Welie</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/32132</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Martijn van Welie</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good that you bring the issue of standarization up again. As a matter of fact, the issue has also been discussed among the owners of the pattern libraries you mention. We are all willing in principle but it turned out difficult to settle on one format that everybody could use without compromising their own views on how to write patterns. In my own site I use a language dubbed &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PLML&lt;/span&gt; but so far I am the only one using it and it has not been formally specified. It is certainly not perfect neither. You can see the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;XML&lt;/span&gt; code by clicking on the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PLML&lt;/span&gt; logo next to my patterns. For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.welie.com/patterns/accordion.xml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.welie.com/patterns/accordion.xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ui-pattern#content_40479</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ui-pattern#content_40479</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Martijn van Welie</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

