<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Jeri Hastava</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/32012</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Jeri Hastava</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you! I&amp;#8217;ve been a content strategy &amp;#8220;looky-loo&amp;#8221; for a while now, and your article struck a chord, prompting a response. I especially appreciated the graphic contrasting the approved design with the same design displaying real content.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I would like to add that I believe a piece of the solution is client education. If we agree (tacitly or not) to design web pages in the absence of content, we&amp;#8217;re setting ourselves and our clients up for delay and disappointment. Like Travis, this doesn&amp;#8217;t mean that I always get 100% of the content prior to design approval, but at the very least, it&amp;#8217;s critical to help clients understand the value of content in meeting their goals, and to understand on a visual level, the relationship between the &amp;#8220;shape&amp;#8221; of the &amp;#8220;real &amp;#8221; content and a successful design.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Happily for me, as a one-woman shop, I get to define the process, and set expectations with clients. Like Travis, I also find it helpful to &amp;#8220;assume&amp;#8221; copy writing as well as other content generation tasks in my proposals.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for the article.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-content#content_40408</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the-content#content_40408</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jeri Hastava</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

