<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Philip Santiago</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/31513</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Philip Santiago</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Findability is really hard to design for, and us as a designer need to think more as the user in order to come up with better user interface designs, which will make our content for where people need to go more findable. I believe once designers put themselves in the place of the user having to find the content they marked up in there &lt;span class="caps"&gt;XHTML&lt;/span&gt; it will get the findability ball moving faster.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the_age_of_findability#content_40130</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the_age_of_findability#content_40130</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Santiago</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the ontology part was interesting, and I often wondered how the search engine defined relevance in pages and well this article on how the search engine works, and parses the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; for relevance enlightened me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/strategies-for#content_40227</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/strategies-for#content_40227</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:58:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Santiago</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

