<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Sue Quinion</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/3071</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Sue Quinion</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This article is fantastic.  It provides scientific methodologies for evaluating the efficacy of visual communication as represented in icons.  I used to lead  team of designers who were responsible for developing icons displayed on medical equipment, both hardware and software.  There was a constant debate among the designers over the granularity of detail to that should be incorporated into a 16&amp;#215;16 pixel icon.  Many times the excessive detail was a detriment to searching tasks. This information will be helpful to my former collegues. Thank you for your thorough description&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/icon_analysis#content_5005</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/icon_analysis#content_5005</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sue Quinion</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
