<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Matt Gregg</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/2921</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Matt Gregg</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I dig the article definitely agree with your comment about PMs being as close or closer to their customers and market (or they should be) in a lot of cases. In organizations where UX practicioners work across products/markets or as consultants and don&amp;#8217;t have the in-depth domain experience, it amazes me UXers would assume otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;Wondering which role do you see making decisions about the design/ideation process in terms of research questions to answer and number/medium/fidelity of prototypes which facilitate the internal and external conversations/vision?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/transitioning-from#content_4882</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/transitioning-from#content_4882</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Matt Gregg</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey John,&lt;br /&gt;This might be a little bit of a tangent topic, but it might be interesting to address how the strategies you plan to outline also mingle with external search engines. Depending on the site, a lot of traffic could be coming from external vs. internal search. It might be nice to see how the strategies complement, inhibit or enhance external search. Maybe this would be a part 2 :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/9220#content_9325</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/9220#content_9325</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Matt Gregg</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
