<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Michael Hartmann</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/2848</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Michael Hartmann</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From my experience complexity sometimes is due to the customer. @David: Sure, Microsoft does add features and features and therefore makes the application more complex. I&amp;#8217;ve developed an Excel-Access based application that did one thing very good. It was simple. However, I was asked if it could do this and that. Then I did implement some additional features but not all because they would have made it a lot harder to keep it simple.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;To me, keeping someting simple starts with the feature list. Reduce it as much as possible and stay focused. I&amp;#8217;d rather have 4 apps each doing one thing perfect that 1 doing 4 things acceptable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/simplicity-the#content_4818</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/simplicity-the#content_4818</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Hartmann</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

