<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by martin lock</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/27666</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by martin lock</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The factors that are determinant in a website&#8217;s &lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehotels.in" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehot&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt; Alexa rankings apart from the data collected from the users of the Alexa toolbar are no where clearly mentioned. This somehow brings in a question of doubt and credibility issues as far as the Alexa rankings are concerned. However, even today the Alexa toolbar has the largest chunk in determining the ranking of a website.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_35117</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_35117</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>martin lock</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

