<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by andy EDMONDS</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/2669</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by andy EDMONDS</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A critical variable missing from this dialog is the &amp;#8220;bounce rate&amp;#8221;, or the number of people who leave the site on the same page as they enter it. This number can range as high as 50% for sites that get visitors from natural search or &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PPC&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;The fold is a pivotal point in this scenario, as the content above the fold has to convince the user that the page has value for the current information need.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, I fully endorse the conclusion that splitting articles into multiple pages has no basis in usability and is in fact a user negative, while alas, a revenue positive design choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of#content_10952</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of#content_10952</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>andy EDMONDS</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
