<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Eric Olive</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/24713</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Eric Olive</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A thorough, careful, and well researched approach to the challenges surrounding browse and search. &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IFB&lt;/span&gt; seems dramatically more intuitive than traditional breadcrumb solutions I&amp;#8217;ve encountered. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/faceted-finding-with#content_52703</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/faceted-finding-with#content_52703</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Olive</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Paul:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Well done. Great lead and useful statistics in the opening section of this article. I was not surprised that FB and cell phone users do not correspond with all of their &amp;#8220;friends,&amp;#8221; but &lt;span class="caps"&gt;I WAS&lt;/span&gt; surprised by the low numbers of people most of us actually call or contact.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;You clearly and concisely explain Fowler and Christakis&amp;#8217;s insightful work (Connected is a fascinating read) before extrapolating about the implications for UX design.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Thank You,&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Eric O.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_53317</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_53317</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Eric Olive</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

