<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Jorge Arango</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/228</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Jorge Arango</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Luke, I&amp;#8217;ve corrected the spelling of your name in the story. (Sorry about this!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using-design-games#content_10359</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using-design-games#content_10359</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your feedback. I&amp;#8217;d rather focus the story on reviewing the book&amp;#8212;I&amp;#8217;m drawn by the fact that it&amp;#8217;s a document of design decisions by the author of the app itself.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There are other places online where you can find a wealth of info on outliners. Ted Goransen has written a series of reviews of Mac outliners over at &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ATPM&lt;/span&gt;: &lt;a href="http://www.atpm.com/Back/atpo.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.atpm.com/Back/atpo.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;One of these articles focuses on Tinderbox as it compares to other outliners: &lt;a href="http://www.atpm.com/10.10/atpo.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.atpm.com/10.10/atpo.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/12348#content_13517</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/12348#content_13517</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m interested in your perspective on how UX / IA / design is impacted by being applied within a &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SCRUM&lt;/span&gt; workflow&amp;#8230;
* How is our &amp;#8220;regular&amp;#8221; design process changed? 
* Do tools and techniques require adjusting? (e.g. sitemapping, wireframing, etc.?) 
* What are the design leadership challenges?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/11003#content_13518</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/11003#content_13518</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:28:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jeff, thanks for writing, and sorry to hear you&amp;#8217;re having trouble with the story.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Meet your peers&amp;#8221; was something of an experiment for B&amp;amp;A. The idea was to convey the overwhelming feeling one gets at the IA Summits of meeting all these people in one place in a short amount of time. I believed (and still do) that the best way to do this was to present all 50-odd videos on the same page.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We knew going in that we were pushing the envelope with regards to what is possible with Flash video, so we went to great lengths to ensure that the story wouldn&amp;#8217;t give too much trouble. Specifically:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;* We coded the story so the videos don&amp;#8217;t load when the page is loaded. Each video only starts loading once you click on it. As a result, you don&amp;#8217;t need a fast internet connection.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;* We tested the page extensively on various browsers and platforms, including old (obsolete) browsers. We didn&amp;#8217;t get any trouble from any of the configurations we tested. (It&amp;#8217;s also worth noting that the story has published over three weeks, and this is the first complaint we&amp;#8217;ve received about it.)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Can you give us more details about the environment you loaded the page in? (System memory, operating system version, browser version, news reader where you followed the link from, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/topics/view/18911#content_19357</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/topics/view/18911#content_19357</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ben, there seems to be a lot of interest for this idea. That said, we already have a multi-story exploration of dashboards in progress. (Latest installment: &lt;a href="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/enhancing-dashboard" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/enhancing-dashboard&lt;/a&gt;) How would your story differ from (or build on) Joe&amp;#8217;s?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/31795#content_39421</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/31795#content_39421</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ross, we don&amp;#8217;t republish stories that have already been posted elsewhere. However, if you can propose a new (different) angle on this topic, we could take a second look.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/39612#content_39762</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/39612#content_39762</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jorge Arango</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

