<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Tony Tulathimutte</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/22280</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Tony Tulathimutte</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andres&#8212; Yeah, you&amp;#8217;re absolutely right about the mayhem:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We had two moderators dividing up the six participants between each other; otherwise you run the risk of asking redundant questions.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We had the observers chat with us over IM whenever possible, or had them pass questions to us during the (very brief) lulls in testing; we also had a chat room in which the moderators and support staff could all coordinate with one another.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;As for who to focus on, that was largely driven by observing what each player was doing. If they were performing a task the developers were interested in, we switched the focus to them; we also encouraged players to thinkaloud while playing, not necessarily anticipating a response. If there was a technical glitch or request, we just had the participants wave at the camera to catch our attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/researching-video#content_31743</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/researching-video#content_31743</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tony Tulathimutte</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds great, and good to hear that there&amp;#8217;s a distinction being made between automated and moderated remote tools! And right now, some good places to start looking are:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&#8212;Elizabeth Bacon&amp;#8217;s public Google Docs spreadsheet of remote research tools: &lt;a href="http://remoteusability.com/remote-testing-tools-round-up-by-liz-bacon/#content" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://remoteusability.com/remote-testing-tools-round-up-&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&#8212;Our tools page on our website, RemoteUsability.com: &lt;a href="http://remoteusability.com/tools/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://remoteusability.com/tools/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&#8212;Chapter 8 of the forthcoming Remote Research book, by Nate Bolt and yours truly, covers not only moderated and automated tools and services, but also recording, notetaking, and recruiting tools for remote research: &lt;a href="http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/remote-research/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/remote-research/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/47735#content_47953</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/47735#content_47953</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tony Tulathimutte</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and one other thing I&amp;#8217;d add is that while remote methods do save on certain costs (mostly travel and recruiting), the actual difference in the total project cost isn&amp;#8217;t really that huge. I think that the cost savings are a nice plus, but that the main benefits of remote methods are that you&amp;#8217;re able to talk to users who are on their actual computers and in their usual computing environment&#8212;and if you&amp;#8217;re live recruiting (that is, recruiting visitors to your website using a form), then you can contact users right as they&amp;#8217;re about to perform a task you&amp;#8217;re interested in observing. That means that users are intrinsically motivated to perform their tasks; you&amp;#8217;re not just telling them to pretend that they want to do something.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/47735#content_47954</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/47735#content_47954</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Tony Tulathimutte</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

