<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Adrian Chong</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1856</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Adrian Chong</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great interview! Schwartz&#8217;s insight definitely help inform some of the design decisions we make but I have to agree with Jonathan on the comments Schwartz was making about gatekeepers. Depending on the gatekeeper&#8217;s agenda, information can be as erroneous or misleading as having an abundance of choice.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Schwartz mentioned his preference for a range of editors who help him filter what he reads. As Jonathan already alluded, this happens constantly and in more interesting ways on the web. Implicit actions like collaborating filtering or explicit actions such as voting can act as editors in their own rite. Regardless, the book definitely helps our case against &#8220;features for the sake of having features&#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interview-with-barry#content_4394</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interview-with-barry#content_4394</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Adrian Chong</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
