<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Steven Grieshaber</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1833</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Steven Grieshaber</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The danger inherent in this &amp;#8220;method&amp;#8221; approach is the designers actually believing the stuff they make up in their head to the exclusion of actual observation. I think there&amp;#8217;s a natural tendency to have the belief &amp;#8220;I&amp;#8217;m a user, I know what I want&amp;#8221; and this could feed that tendency.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Would have to keep a very close eye on that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/bring_your_pers#content_4113</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/bring_your_pers#content_4113</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Steven Grieshaber</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think wireframes are the best bet for early testing. I also believe in testing additional users again with higher fidelity designs and comparing the results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/real_wireframes#content_4114</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/real_wireframes#content_4114</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Steven Grieshaber</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
