<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Edo A. Elan</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/182334</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Edo A. Elan</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An IxDA colleague referred me to your article &amp;#8211; after reading my recent post on Facebook friend circle size (&lt;a href="http://tpgblog.com/2010/05/10/edo-amin-facebook-like/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tpgblog.com/2010/05/10/edo-amin-facebook-like/&lt;/a&gt;). Your article fills in the blanks for me!&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Dunbar actually talks about a series of numbers, not just 5 and 150. Are more distinct strength levels beyond strong and weak? I notice anecdotal evidence among my friends who are teachers and journalists, who seem to have a moment of truth when reaching around 500 followers.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Doesn&amp;#8217;t this have huge implication for, say, contact book design? For example, when a user moves beyond 150 or 500 contacts, shouldn&amp;#8217;t filtering and removal tasks be escalated to mission-critical status?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_53622</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/designing-for-social#content_53622</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Edo A. Elan</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

