<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Sean McBride</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/17822</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Sean McBride</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with your assessment of Amazon&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Most helpful positive and negative reviews&amp;#8221; feature. It&amp;#8217;s not important that the two reviewers aren&amp;#8217;t judging the product by the same metrics. In fact, I&amp;#8217;d say it&amp;#8217;s desirable. The questions that this answers are &amp;#8220;What things did a trustworthy person like?&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;What things did a trustworthy person not like?&amp;#8221; Then, the potential buyer can compare the priorities of those two reviewers to their own and decide which factors they think are most important. This mirrors real life. I ask multiple people their opinions about an important decision so that I can see how different people think about the same problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/on-a-scale-of-1-to-5#content_24045</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/on-a-scale-of-1-to-5#content_24045</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sean McBride</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

