<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Mike Baxter</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1720</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Mike Baxter</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The first part of the article is a useful and topical discussion of the emerging role of simulation (or prototyping) for requirements definition and more.  But the &amp;#8220;review&amp;#8221; of simulation products seems weak, as the above comments point out inaccurate and outdated information for products like Axure and Simunication and suggest other products and product features might have been included.  Isn&#8217;t pricing a significant factor to include in any product comparison?  I notice that only one &amp;#8220;reviewed&amp;#8221; product has &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221; for each feature listed and must wonder how coincidental that is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/visio_replaceme#content_4041</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/visio_replaceme#content_4041</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mike Baxter</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

