<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Michael Hughes</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1689</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Michael Hughes</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good article, Scott. I too am in the Axure camp because what I really need is a wireframe/mid-fidelity prototyping tool. I think it is a good gateway tool to some of the more robust requirements management tools discussed in this article. I have found with Axure, that I must have external ways to link my designs back to requirements and to use case elaborations. Tools like i-rise seem pricey if compared to Visio and Axure, but it must be compared to fuller requirments management suites, such as Rationale.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/visio_replaceme#content_4022</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/visio_replaceme#content_4022</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Hughes</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

