<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Chris Korhonen</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/16682</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Chris Korhonen</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice tutorial &amp;#8211; I think that in many cases a visual representation of a final design is much more useful than a set of functional specifications.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;That said, I would advise caution when using this method, mainly clients &amp;#8211; particularly where agencies tend to get carried away, in my experience, is with some of the additional presentation features which are possible in Flash. A cool pre-loader, swirly fade in-animation may be fantastic when it comes to impressing people when pitching a design, but really just sets everyone up to fail with unrealistic expections.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Be careful not to get carried away making something which is poor usability (but looks cool), or which is itself a pain to implement with vanilla &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_21834</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_21834</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Chris Korhonen</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

