<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Anne Gibson</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/15450</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Anne Gibson</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#8217;d also be useful to comment on who should be doing the testing, and when or how frequently, since some organizations (whistles innocently) tend to fragment this type of work across multiple roles.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/19268#content_19274</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/19268#content_19274</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Anne Gibson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I would expect an ontology-building tool to emerge using social factors to allow anyone in the world to contribute, much like a wiki. In time, such a resource might grow large enough to provide computers with an information base so broad and deep that it would become difficult to stump them in a Turing test.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Which makes me really tempted to create a public ontology where we use Turing tests to identify gaps in the knowledge. I wonder if there&amp;#8217;s already an open-source Turing-test discussion engine in php floating out on the net&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;ugh, too many ideas, not enough time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/applying-turings#content_29763</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/applying-turings#content_29763</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Anne Gibson</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
