<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Michael Burke</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/15085</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Michael Burke</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is exactly the type of article I&amp;#8217;d like to read about. My experience with agile and Interaction Design has been chaotic at best. Adequate requirements gathering and user testing have been sacrificed at the expense of quick iterations and feeding the &amp;#8220;beast&amp;#8221; or developers as quickly as possible.4-5 days is not enough time to understand the domain digest the requirements and come up with an adequate user interface as well as get some validation from user testing.  I think we&amp;#8217;ll see the backlash very soon. There has to be a happy medium between traditional waterfal and all out agile. Maybe when the tail stops wagging the dog so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/18774#content_18851</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/18774#content_18851</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Burke</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
