<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Will Schwalbe</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/13980</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Will Schwalbe</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yaniv&amp;#8212;Thanks so much for the incredibly thoughtful review of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SEND&lt;/span&gt;. And I was also very interested in the comments from Chris and Laurie. &amp;#8220;Spammy&amp;#8221; emails are a huge problem. Everyone gripes about &amp;#8220;Spam&amp;#8221; and there has been some attention given lately to the huge problem of &amp;#8220;Bacn&amp;#8221;&amp;#8212;but there hasn&amp;#8217;t been nearly enough talk about genuinely personal emails that are too chatty, too frequent, or have overlong signatures. (I do think your office manager example is fascinating&amp;#8212;it&amp;#8217;s a classic example of how one size doesn&amp;#8217;t fit all&amp;#8212;and I can see how useful it would be for the office manager and the recipients). And I should add that I&amp;#8217;m a big fan of Mark Hurst and his terrific book &lt;span class="caps"&gt;BIT LITERACY&lt;/span&gt;, so was really pleased to see that mentioned in Laurie&amp;#8217;s comment.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;And you make excellent points, too, about some of the things we missed. I wish we had put in something about the &amp;#8220;arms race&amp;#8221;&amp;#8212;it&amp;#8217;s incredibly interesting. And I&amp;#8217;m not at all current on how to make email easier to retrieve on a search utility, so exploring that is my homework assignment for the next week.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I do, however, want to mount a mildly spirited defense of the discussion about the tonal difference between &amp;#8220;Sincerely&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Best.&amp;#8221; As I&amp;#8217;ve been talking to people, I&amp;#8217;ve been finding that this is an area of real concern and confusion. For example, I met a very nice college student at Seton Hall a few months ago who was ridiculed by his office mates at his investment bank summer internship because he kept using &amp;#8220;Sincerely&amp;#8221; as his closing in all his emails to them, even after working there for more than month. They nicknamed him &amp;#8220;Sincerely&amp;#8221; but he still couldn&amp;#8217;t quite see what he was doing wrong. He thought he was being polite when he was actually being stuffy.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Also, thanks for quoting the &amp;#8220;Defcon&amp;#8221; example. But I&amp;#8217;m embarrassed to say that we made a mistake with it&amp;#8212;we reversed the Defcon order. Defcon One is the highest state of alert. There&amp;#8217;s a new edition of the book coming in September and we&amp;#8217;ve fixed it for that; we&amp;#8217;ve also added some discussion of &amp;#8220;inbox zero&amp;#8221; and other ways people have proposed to keep email from becoming overwhelming. And we put in something about handheld etiquette, too.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Finally, what a fascinating site!!! I&amp;#8217;ll be coming back often.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Sincerely, well, er, Best! :-)&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Will&lt;br /&gt;co-author of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SEND&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/minding-your-ps-and#content_16944</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/minding-your-ps-and#content_16944</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Will Schwalbe</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
