<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Riccardo Fusaroli</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1376</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Riccardo Fusaroli</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This suggestion has been developed with Claudio Vandi (another B&amp;amp;A user).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/3765#content_3776</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/3765#content_3776</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Riccardo Fusaroli</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting development of your reflections would be:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;a) how re-think e-paper for contents like online newspaper&lt;br /&gt;b) how re-think contents for e-paper.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;From what you say e-paper is not exactly like normal paper and not exactly like a computer, so it&amp;#8217;s really stimulating to think about which consequences this should have.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/3775#content_3781</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/3775#content_3781</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Riccardo Fusaroli</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

