<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Indi Young</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/13559</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Indi Young</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comments!  (I&amp;#8217;m Indi, the author of the book.)  Yes, this is a way of visualizing data, and it is &amp;#8220;a very powerful way to explain these relationships to a customer.&amp;#8221; It also keeps the designer focused on the user, not the product. Many companies still design iteratively based on how well an existing product works, which is fine, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t give you a wider perspective.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;As far as the term &amp;#8220;mental model,&amp;#8221; in the past decade cognitive scientists have broadened the meaning again and again. I felt that this representation of data falls within those broader definitions.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;The &amp;#8220;fishbone&amp;#8221; (or &amp;#8220;spine&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;horizon&amp;#8221;) diagram is key in that it shows alignment between the things a person is doing and the ways an organization supports it.  So the alignment is the important bit.  Above or below the line the representation can take any form. I&amp;#8217;ve found that three hierarchical levels of affinity are the right amount of data to depict.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/what-is-your-mental#content_16027</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/what-is-your-mental#content_16027</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Indi Young</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
