<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by David James Nicol</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1336</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by David James Nicol</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;My initial reaction is to ask why bother with wireframes at all?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;With access to the right skills, it may well be easier to go straight to a &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; prototype. This, I believe, could be better at overcoming the problems external people often have with wireframes.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Going straight to a prototype would be especially applicable if the project is to improve an existing page or site (is in the example), as the current pages provide a &amp;#8216;template&amp;#8217; which can form the basis for the prototype.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/real_wireframes#content_3585</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/real_wireframes#content_3585</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>David James Nicol</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
