<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Julie  Booth</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/127962</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:13:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Julie  Booth</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this article, Anthony.  I think your conclusion touched on Rajeev&amp;#8217;s points:  &amp;#8220;dogmatic attitudes about each of these [ucd /agile} approaches should be avoided if they are to be combined. &amp;#8221;  Right, Agile is a philosophy and not a process&amp;#8230;   My experience has been that people who are ingrained in long time waterfall methodology and old-school practices cling to a process.  It is really hard to get both parties to think philosophically :).  Anthony points out the minefields there&amp;#8212;for that I am grateful.  Am bringing this article to a meeting today about &amp;#8220;Institutionalizing UX&amp;#8221; into our recently-converted-to-agile culture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/bringing-user#content_50308</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/bringing-user#content_50308</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:13:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Julie  Booth</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

