<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Prof A P Macmillan Coxon</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1253</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Prof A P Macmillan Coxon</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating stuff: But I am astonished how the three main user-communities of sorting seem to know nothing (or ignore?) others: Cognitive anthropology (&amp;#8220;pile-sorts&amp;#8221;), social scientists &amp;#8220;free-sorts&amp;#8221;). There&amp;#8217;s some relevant info in my Sage &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QASS&lt;/span&gt; monograph (Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis, 1999 &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISBN 0&lt;/span&gt;-8039-7237-7) and also &lt;a href="http://www.methodofsorting.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.methodofsorting.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide#content_4116</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide#content_4116</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Prof A P Macmillan Coxon</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
