<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Ant Tanant</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1226</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Ant Tanant</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, Alexa. At my previous job I used this method for the same purpose as well. I went this route because I a) lacked the knowledge to get it to work with real code, b) we didn&amp;#8217;t have a full type prototyper, and c) it was much faster and didn&amp;#8217;t require dev resources&amp;#8212;granted I knew the basics of Flash so the transition was easier. At my current job we have a full time prototyper, but I still find this method great for quick studies that require the demonstration of interactions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_22585</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/quick-and-easy-flash#content_22585</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ant Tanant</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

