<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Rex Chung</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1206</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Rex Chung</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff! One of the best article I&amp;#8217;ve read in a while. &lt;br /&gt;This type of research strengthens the theory of how the brain works from &amp;#8216;On intelligence&amp;#8217; by Jeff Hawkins that I&amp;#8217;ve been reading. He suggests that our brain make predictions and process information at the same time. In this case, our brain makes a prediction of what the icon is from the blurry details received and from our own memory.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m interested to know if there&amp;#8217;s research with familliar icons/signs together with spatial frequency. I think what the user already knows add a big difference to recognition, e.g. red and &amp;#8217;!&amp;#8217; usually means warning, danger. The common shape of &amp;#8216;arrow&amp;#8217;, &amp;#8216;home&amp;#8217; and &amp;#8216;refresh&amp;#8217; icons are already in our memory. I&amp;#8217;ve personally experienced the difference it makes when Yahoo decided to flip the icons horizontally, even though the elements in the icon was the same, I just couldnt recognise it. E.g. if we put the chimney of the house icon to the left side, it just doesn&amp;#8217;t look right.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/icon_analysis#content_3315</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/icon_analysis#content_3315</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Rex Chung</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
