<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by steve arnold</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/118407</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:32:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by steve arnold</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great article thanks Dave. We&amp;#8217;ve traditionally used a lot of card sorting but were looking to use task based testing and this looks like the way to go &amp;#8211; we&amp;#8217;ll definitely be using this in upcoming projects. Like you mentioned, we find it really important in an IA redesign to demonstrate that the new proposed IA is an improvement on the old one and this looks like a fast and efficient solution, especially for testing remote users.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/tree-testing#content_49921</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/tree-testing#content_49921</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:32:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>steve arnold</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

