<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Albert Borrero</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/11443</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Albert Borrero</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most baffling situations facing large international or global non-profit and development agencies, is facing many sets of stakeholders who are at many times at the opposite ends of the of the organization&amp;#8217;s value chain. These stakeholders are a diverse set of users&amp;#8212;inside and outside the organization&amp;#8212;who may require a broad range of experiences based on their interests interacting with the organization&amp;#8212;be it with Web or analog interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;This article might want to touch on almost &amp;#8220;schizophrenic&amp;#8221; tendencies of organizations who have multiple stakeholders and users. In most instances that I observed, these kinds of organizations, who in a desire to provide meaningful UX to its communities, find difficulty focusing on stakeholders who need its attention and priority.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Where is the line drawn? What is and should be the organization&amp;#8217;s focus? Is responsiveness to one set of users necessarily an expense of another set? Lots of questions that may have constructive answers which perhaps is interesting to cover in this article.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/12282#content_12995</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/12282#content_12995</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Albert Borrero</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
