<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Lance Jones</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/10882</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Lance Jones</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that excellent article.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Makes me wonder about the idea of &amp;#8220;deriving value&amp;#8221; from a network. You mention that weak ties are better at providing value to the individual than strong ties. Yet you cite Ning&amp;#8217;s model, which would seem to encourage the creation of small, affinity-based, strong-tie communities. Will Ning users look to derive value in a different way?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Maybe there&amp;#8217;s a distinction to be made between more utilitarian communities like LinkedIn [primarily for professional networking] and other, more purely social communities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/social-networks#content_12233</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/social-networks#content_12233</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Lance Jones</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
