<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Gilbert Guerrero</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1056</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Gilbert Guerrero</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m struck by the idea that a metaphor can be discarded after it&amp;#8217;s proven its usefulness, and then the previously foreign product or idea may be used down the line as a metaphor itself&amp;#8230; and so on.  In a sense, we can&amp;#8217;t hold onto our metaphors too tightly and must welcome new ones.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I also like the thought that metaphors should be employed up to their usefulness.  Certain aspects apply while others should be left behind to pave the way for formerly impossible features.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Great article.  Looking forward to part 2!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using_adoption_#content_3211</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/using_adoption_#content_3211</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Gilbert Guerrero</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
