<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Santy S</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/10473</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Santy S</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I was pleasantly surprised to come across this article in Boxes and Arrows!&lt;br /&gt;Joseph&amp;#8217;s recommendations above are useful. And thanks to Maureen for publishing this article. I never thought that this was such an underutilized feature. I first discovered the interactive power point show back in grad school while tinkering with it for a class project- as I wanted something quick and dirty to demonstrate a tool in my &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CHI&lt;/span&gt; class. And incidentally now I am using it as a tool to do some quick usability tests at work.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I think it is a very useful tool to run quick and easy tests with users at any time in the design process. And it doesn&amp;#8217;t take too much work to set it up either. Thanks for sharing it with everyone Maureen!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interactive#content_11832</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/interactive#content_11832</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Santy S</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Have you checked this out? Document Collaboration: &lt;a href="http://nextpage.com/products/collaboration/index.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://nextpage.com/products/collaboration/index.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Give it a try and tell us what you think.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/11981#content_12068</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/11981#content_12068</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Santy S</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great suggestion!&lt;br /&gt;And, Maassen- good observation! I agree with it. This has always been a dilemma for me too.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;What if we put &amp;#8220;OK&amp;#8221; first and &amp;#8220;Cancel&amp;#8221; later if we placed the buttons on the left side of the page and vice versa if we placed the right side of the page? I think an additional affordance could be to introduced with a visual distinction between the two buttons as well.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I came across another article by Luke W, that really creates some food for thought. Read it here: &lt;a href="http://www.lukew.com/resources/articles/PSactions.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.lukew.com/resources/articles/PSactions.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/13639#content_14044</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/13639#content_14044</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Santy S</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
