<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by Jussi Pasanen</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/101908</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Jussi Pasanen</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave, and thanks for a great article!&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#8217;ve used Treejack since its initial launch early this year and have had good experiences with it, some of which we shared in April:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Using Treejack to test your website structure&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.volkside.com/2009/04/using-treejack-for-ia-testing/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.volkside.com/2009/04/using-treejack-for-ia-tes&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;There is also another tool in the market called C-Inspector that is specifically designed for tree testing. We posted an article looking at C-Inspector in September, including comparisons with your Treejack tool:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Test your information architecture using C-Inspector&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.volkside.com/2009/09/test-your-ia-using-c-inspector/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.volkside.com/2009/09/test-your-ia-using-c-insp&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Both articles discuss screen-based IA testing more generally, too.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Cheers, Jussi&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Ps. Matthias makes some great points above that are worth taking into consideration in future development.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/tree-testing#content_49246</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/tree-testing#content_49246</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Jussi Pasanen</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

